19 October 2006

stop breeding

for those of you who begged me to repost this

i saw a headline that caught my eye at starbucks today. it read next stop for us population: 300,000,000

it made me very angry.

let me break it down for you people: selfish breeders are overpopulating the world

there are many things i can think of that are because of overcrowding. here is a brief list that i came up with while i was weaving in and out of screaming children at the grocery store:
1. less children would mean more money for the adults who don't them. more money, happier people.

2. more money=more expendable income. more expendable income=bigger houses. bigger houses=more taxes. more taxes=cleaner cities and better schools (for the few people who should be allowed to breed in my new world order)

3. less children now means less crime later. here's how that breaks down: people would be less angry if there less people to compete with in this world. be it for jobs, members of the opposite sex, personal space, the less people in the world, the more breathing room we would all have.

4. maybe if you just had one kid, you could pay more attention to that kid rather than having to keep track of 3 or 4 or 5. and maybe that kid will get the attention that s/he deserves and become a productive member of society, rather than being some afterthought and resort to crime or acting as a way to get attention.

5. less kids would mean less SUVs and minivans on the road. less SUVs and minivans would probably mean less accidents (because i don't know about you, but i can never see around those fucking things in traffic), more gas for everyone, and more room to park. and in order to get an SUV (in my NWO), you'd have to be a contractor or... no, just a contractor. i really can't see any other use for them. as for minivans, if you have one and you don't have kids, then you're just a loser.

6. adults can finally have their world back. we wouldn't have the moral majority crying, "won't someone please think of the children!" because the few that exist wouldn't be enough to make anyone care. and maybe the media would finally give up on this "bleeding heart" tactic of playing up the death of a kid. bah. they're totally useless in our society, wasting our resources, time and energy. the only who cares about that kid dying is the parents. boo hoo. and if you only had one, you could keep an eye on whether they were watching the spice channel or reading "on the road" or "fight club." oh, and i wouldn't have to be bombarded with flashy, dumbass advertisements anymore, be it on TV or in a magazine or on the radio. and no more toy and candy aisles in the grocery stores. so i don't have to hear any of those rugrats whining that they have to have that. boo-fucking-hoo. you don't even know what it is, yet you have to have it? get a fucking job, then you can buy it.

7. not having kids will prevent things what happened in amish town, PA, earlier this week. that guy who killed those girls in that schoolshouse was deeply depressed over losing his infant daughter 9 YEARS AGO. i have an idea, asshole: GET COUNSELING. and i'm not upset that kids were killed, i'm upset that someone can let something like that get to him for so long that the only other option is kidnap a bunch of amish girls and kill them execution-style. that's a little extreme. don't get me wrong, the amish breed like rabbits, but they also have farms to run, clothes to make, butter to churn. they actually do need the extra hands. they also don't overrun the public school system, nor do they live on government money. oh, and they keep their kids in line with something called "discipline," something that seems to be pretty rare these days.

i am not going to have kids. i will be able to keep all of my 401k, spend my freetime furthering my education, taking trips, reading quietly and going out on a moment's notice. i can buy a house with only 2 bedrooms because that extra room will just be for storage. and what will i do with all that extra money? roll around in it. oh, and go shopping for whatever i want.

maybe with fewer people in the world, maybe we can actually feel like we have a place in somewhere. right now, with the way we're going, your kids will have to compete against millions of kids to 1) get into college 2) get a decent job. this is the BREEDERS' FAULT. you felt that having kids was more important than the bigger picture. if people had one kid, maybe they could give that one kid a better education. vacations. experiences. you can save more money for their education. but instead people are having tons of kids and barely getting by. they may not go to college if they don't get scholarships. and then what? they work at the wendy's drive through until they die?

and thanks to the advancements in medicine, they won't die until they're 100. but that's another rant altogether.

2 Comments:

Blogger Chris Ketcham said...

Yeah!!!!

The best thing you can do for kids, is to not have any.

4:04 PM, October 06, 2006  
Blogger Chris Ketcham said...

Using Babies for Good:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/10/09/baby.weapon.ap/index.html

2:58 PM, October 09, 2006  

Post a Comment

<< Home

eXTReMe Tracker